Legal Opinion

American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Goldstein Fruit & Produce Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1948No. Civil Action 7713PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, District Judge.

This is an appeal by the respondent from an adverse order of the Secretary of Agri- ' culture in a reparation proceeding brought against it under The Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act 1 of 1930, as amended.

Pursuant to Sec. 6 of the Act, 7 U.S. C.A. § 499f, the complainant filed its complaint with the Secretary against the respondent, the principal place of business of which is in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, claiming a loss of Twelve Hundred and 67/100 Dollars ($1200.67), with interest, because of the alleged rejection without reasonable cause by the latter of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. W. H. Lailer & Co. v. C. E. Jackson Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
  2. Login Corporation v. BotnerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
  3. Commissioner v. Realty Operators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Shreiner v. Farmers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stanfield v. Texas Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Hall v. Salem Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 17, McCook CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hess Oil & Chem. Corp. v. Doremus Sport ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  4. Chidsey v. GeurinDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1970
  5. Israel v. MerrillCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API