Legal Opinion
W. H. Lailer & Co. v. C. E. Jackson Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 6, 1948No. Civil Action 6853PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a reparation order of the Secretary of Agriculture under Act of June 10, 1930, c. 436, § 7(c), as amended. U.S.C.A. Title 7, § 499g(c). Two motions are before me, one to dismiss the appeal as not timely taken, the other to enter judgment for appellee on the pleadings.
The basis of the first motion is the statutory provision that “either party adversely affected by the entry of a reparation order by the Secretary may, within thirty days from and after the date of such order, appeal therefrom to the district court * * *. Such appeal shall be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keene Lumber Co. v. LeventhalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. PillsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Goldstein Fruit & Produce Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Hoy v. Newburg Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
- Matter of Application No. 0436-A Into 3841New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Arroyo Merino v. Junta AzucareraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.