Legal Opinion

Chidsey v. Geurin

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 30, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 54PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOX, District Judge.

Petitioner is appealing a reparation order issued March 15, 1968, by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, as amended (7 U.S.C. § 499a et seq.).

District courts are given authority to hear such appeals in Section 7(c) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499g(c):

Appeal from reparation order; proceedings(c) Either party adversely affected by the entry of a reparation order by the Secretary may, within thirty days from and after the date of such order, appeal therefrom to the district court of the United States for the district…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
W. H. Lailer & Co. v. C. E. Jackson Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Harland W. Chidsey, D/B/A Harland W. Chidsey Farms v. Bert A. Guerin, D/B/A Bert GeurinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
Alphas Co., Inc. v. Dan Tudor & Sons Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012