Legal Opinion

Chase v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 26, 1941No. 7685PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.

This is an action brought under R.S. § 4915.1 Appellant George C. Chase was the applicant for a patent. Monroe Calculating Machine Company (the other appellant) is his assignee. The Chase application was involved in an interference with an application of Harold T. Avery. The Patent Office awarded priority to Chase and — as the result of a previous decision of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals — held against Avery’s contention that there was an estoppel against Chase as to the claims in issue. Avery then in turn appealed to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Chase made no objection…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bakelite Corporation v. National Aniline & Chem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. United States Ex Rel. White v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Jensen v. LorenzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  4. Wettlaufer v. RobinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. Gams v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. McBride v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1943
  4. Taylor v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API