Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Chinn Ho

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1959No. 4082PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Hawaiian Trust Company, Limited, A. F. Mahn and Edward C. Hustace, Administrators of the Estate of Victoria Kathleen Ward, Deceased, have filed a motion asking that they be substituted as appellees in this case in the place of the present appellees of record. The question for decision is whether the administrators may properly be substituted for present appellees, and, if so, whether they are the only parties who may be so substituted.

Present appellees are Chinn Ho, George H. Vicars, Jr., and Mark Norman Olds, who were guardians of the estate of Victoria *242Kathleen Ward during her lifetime and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jameson v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Hardy v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Colburn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Colburn v. CarterHawaii Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Campbell v. DePonteHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API