Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Marcus

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1936No. Civ. No. 5639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An action was filed by Mary Marcus against her son Louis Marcus, defendant and appellant herein, to rescind for lack of consideration a conveyance by. her to appellant of an undivided one-half interest in a particular piece of real property, and to quiet her title thereto.

During the pendency of this action Mary Marcus died, and Russell D. Hardy, as special administrator of her estate, was substituted as plaintiff. The question involved is the right of the executor of an estate to be substituted as party plaintiff in an action brought by the deceased in her lifetime against her…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poon v. PoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Sutton v. Chinn HoHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hill v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API