Legal Opinion

Duskin v. Parks

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided March 3, 1978No. 1971XPublished

1Opinion of the Court

GUARINO, J.,

This issue presents itself on defendant’s objection in nature of demurrer to the complaint.

In testing sufficiency of the cause of action, all relevant facts which are well pleaded and all reasonable inferences flowing therefrom are admitted p.s true: Duffee v. Judson, 251 Pa. Superior Ct. 406, 380 A. 2d 843, 845 (1977). See also Hexter v. Haverford Township, 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 168, 82 A. 2d 668 (1951); Byers v. Ward, 368 Pa. 416, 84 A. 2d 307 (1951); Narehood v. Pearson, 374 Pa. 299, 96 A. 2d 895 (1953); Borden v. Baldwin, 444 Pa. 577, 281 A. 2d 892 (1971); Reardon v. Wilbur,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hudock v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Narehood v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Byers v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Duffee v. JudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. BORDEN v. BALDWINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API