Legal Opinion

Junior Order United American Mechanics v. Ringo

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 6, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Menefee Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Affirming.

The facts of this controversy are stated' in the opinion delivered on the former appeal. (See Funeral Benefit Dept. of Junior Order American Mechanics v. Ringo, 131 S. W., 2.) On the return of the case to the circuit court it was tried again, the trial resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

It is insisted that the court erred in putting the burden of proof in the action upon the defendant. In the former opinion it was held that the denial in the answer that the deceased at the time of his death…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Funeral Benefit Department v. RingoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bates v. City of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Culton v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Kirchdorfer v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. HayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API