Legal Opinion

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Hay

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 18, 1917Published

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

„ This is the second appeal in this ease. The opinion on the former appeal is printed in 165 Ky. 76; and, although the facts are there stated in detail, a brief restatement of the case, in outline, will be necessary to understand the questions involved upon this appeal.

In September, 1911, George 1Y. Harper contracted with Franklin county for the construction of a turnpike *672road for $5,500.00, with the appellant company as his surety. As an inducement, however, for the company becoming Harper’s surety, Hay, Smith, Baker, Horton, and Mills gave the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Kenton Insurance v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Setser's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Cash v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Junior Order United American Mechanics v. RingoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API