Legal Opinion
WINVIEW INC. v. DRAFTKINGS INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 11, 2025No. 3:21-cv-13405Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY WINVIEW INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 21-13405 (GC) (JTQ) v. OPINION DRAFTKINGS INC., et al., Defendants. CASTNER, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendants DraftKings Inc. and Crown Gaming Inc.’s (collectively, DraftKings) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff WinView Inc.’s Second Amended Complaint (SAC) for patent infringement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 70.) WinView opposed (ECF No. 73), and DraftKings replied (ECF No. 74). The Court has carefully considered…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.