Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Horvath

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1998No. 98-0559-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the report of the referee concluding that Attorney Paul R. Horvath *335engaged in professional misconduct by giving false information to a client regarding the status of her post-conviction matters, failing to respond to his client's inquiries about the status of the matters, and failing to respond to inquiries from the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) and the district professional responsibility committee during the investigation of his conduct. The referee recommended that Attorney Horvath's license to practice law be suspended for two years as discipline…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HorvathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HorvathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alan D. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API