Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Horvath

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1997No. 97-2241-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review, pursuant to SCR 2l.09(3m),1 the stipulation of the parties filed with the complaint of the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) alleging that Attorney Paul R. Horvath has engaged in professional misconduct. The parties stipulated that Attorney Horvath's license to practice law be suspended for six months as discipline for that misconduct, which consisted of his failing to comply promptly with a client's reasonable requests for information concerning the status of a collection matter and failing to explain that matter to the client, failing to cooperate in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HorvathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceedings Against HartiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HorvathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gaertner Ex Rel. Minnesota State Patrol v. One 1999 Dodge Pickup Truck, MN Lic. No. GKR-391Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API