Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Horvath

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1984No. 84-201-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney publicly reprimanded.

In this disciplinary proceeding Horvath and the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) stipulated to facts establishing Horvath’s unprofessional conduct and agreed that a public reprimand would be appropriate discipline. The referee made findings of fact consistent with that stipulation and concluded that Horvath neglected a legal matter, in violation of SCR 20.32(3), failed to carry out a contract of employment in that matter, in violation of SCR 20.35(1) (b), misrepresented facts to his client in that matter, in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HorvathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HorvathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API