Rogers v. Kunja Knitting Mills, U.S.A.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Chief Judge:
In this workers’ compensation action, Margaret Gail Rogers appeals the circuit court’s affirmance of the full commission’s order determining that her claim was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We reverse and remand.
I
Rogers worked in Kunja’s knitting department from February 1988 to November 1989. As part of her employment, Rogers was required to clean knitting machines with Shima oil, which caused a rash and other problems on her hands and face.
On November 16, 1990, Rogers filed a workers’ compensation claim (the 1990 Claim), alleging that exposure to Shima oil and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Hilton Head Center of South Carolina, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Baggott v. Southern Music, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Johnson v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Faulkner v. Caledonia County Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004