Legal Opinion

Damazo v. Neal

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 10, 1976No. 878, September Term, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

Several years prior to 1950 Hazen B. Neal and his wife, Lola B. Neal, in three separate transactions, had assembled a parcel of slightly less than two acres of land fronting some 225 feet on East Street, in an industrial area in the City of Frederick. The parcel extended between parallel lines, at approximate right angles to the street, to a depth of about 350 feet.

In 1974, when the Neals decided to sell part of the ' property, it was improved by several buildings, at least one of which had been used to house an automobile dealership. By a contract dated 9 October 1974 Mr. and Mrs. Neal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Levine v. RendlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Montauk Corp. v. SeedsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Lane v. DashiellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  4. Wischhusen v. Spirits Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Perlmutter v. BacasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harford County v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Ortendahl v. BergmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Bouchard v. BluntSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. Smoliak v. MyhrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. (1996), Maryland Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API