Ricks v. Town of Selma
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiffs first assign error to the trial judge’s conclusion that Section 13.20.020, setting rates for either water or sewer service available but not received, was a valid exercise of the statutory authority granted to the town under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A, Article 16. We disagree. The town possessed sufficient statutory authority to set an availability charge for water or sewer service available but not received.
As of 13 September 1983, the date this ordinance was enacted, neither our courts nor legislature had addressed the question before us. However, in 1989, the General…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Town of Taylorsville v. Modern CleanersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- General Textile Printing & Processing Corp. v. City of Rocky MountDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
- Cedar Greene, LLC v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Boles v. Town of Oak IslandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Bogue Shores Homeowners Ass'n v. Town of Atlantic BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Opinion No. (2009), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2009