Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided November 12, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Senator Anderson:

This office has received your letter requesting an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:

Assuming that a city has a water supply available to households within territory annexed by the city, may the city enact an ordinance requiring those households to pay a monthly fee to defray the costs associated with construction of a water treatment plant when those households choose not to obtain their water supply from the city?1

Your question requires an analysis of the rights and powers of a city with regard to the provision of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sequoyah County Rural Water District No. 7 v. Town of MuldrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Airwick Industries, Inc. v. Carlstadt Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Samis Land Co. v. City of Soap LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. McMillan v. Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  5. Seltzer v. Sterling TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API