Legal Opinion
State v. Thomas
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 9, 2003No. 2002-079PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The defendant, Terry Thomas, appeals his conviction on three counts of receiving stolen property, see RSA 687:7 (1996) (amended 2001), following a jury trial in the superior court. We affirm.
On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court erred by failing to conduct a “penetrating and comprehensive” Faretta colloquy before allowing him to proceed pro se at trial, see Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 884-35 (1975); cf. State v. Barham, 126 N.H. 631, 637-38 (1985), and by denying his request for a transcript of his earlier suppression hearing to use for impeachment purposes at trial.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. WeitzmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. BeltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Kenneth H. Hart v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.