Legal Opinion

State v. Weitzman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 6, 1981No. 80-060PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

As the result of his participation in a demonstration at the construction site of the Seabrook nuclear power plant, the defendant was charged with criminal trespass under RSA 635:2. He was found guilty in the Hampton District Court and appealed to the Rockingham County Superior Court, requesting a jury trial. Before trial, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial, a motion to disqualify the jury pool on the grounds that blacks and persons under thirty years of age had been systematically excluded, a motion to conduct voir dire and/or propound specific questions to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. BrugmannMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. State v. BirdSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API