Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Martin

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 25, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00089Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Daniel Stewart, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 3:21-cv-89 : v. : Judge Thomas M. Rose : David W. Martin, et al., : : Defendants. : ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER DISMISSING COUNTS VI-IX OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 54) WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDERING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A BRIEF ADDRESING PLAINTIFFS’ DANIEL STEWART AND RACHEL KOSOFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS PARTIES PURSUANT TO RULE 21 AND TO AMEND COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 109)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wuliger v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Bihn v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. General Acquisition, Inc. v. GenCorp Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  4. Buckeye Recyclers v. CHEP USADistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. Lawser v. Poudre School District R-1District Court, D. Colorado · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API