Legal Opinion
Buckeye Recyclers v. CHEP USA
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 21, 2002No. Case C-3-01-440PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. #7); DEFENDANT DIRECTED TO FILE AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL, WITHIN 20 DAYS OF DATE OF ENTRY, SETTING FORTH CITIZENSHIP OF ITS GENERAL PARTNERS
RICE, Chief Judge.
The parties are now before the Court on Plaintiff Buckeye Recyclers’ (“Buckeye”) Motion to Remand (Doc. # 7). Defendant CHEP USA (“CHEP”) removed this action from the Court of Common Pleas of Clark County, Ohio, on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity jurisdiction) & 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (removal jurisdiction). (See Doc. # 1.) Section 1332 allows a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Super Sulky, Inc. v. United States Trotting AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peggy Welshans Williamson, and Vanessa Welshans v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Smith v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Mailwaukee Mailing, Shipment & Equipment, Inc. v. Neopost, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- 1SOURCE HOLDINGS, LLC v. JACKSONDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Hamm v. Thunderbird Global Development, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.