Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. Bank of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1847PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The Bank of Tennessee sued Hutchins in the circuit court of Franklin county in debt; plea, non est factum¡ and issue» Verdict and judgment thereupon for plaintiff, Marchbanks, judge, presiding. Defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtTouley, J.

Thos. M. Pryor and Mark Hutchins were for many years partners in trade, in buying and selling goods in the town of Winchester, Tennessee; under the name of T. M. Pryor & Co., to wit, from the 18th day of November, 1826, till some time in September 1844.- During the continuance of this partnership, the Branch Bank of the State of Tennessee at Shelby-ville, discounted paper for them, upon their endorsements, both notes and bills. This partnership was dissolved by mutual consent, and a notice thereof inserted in the Republican Banner, a newspaper printed at Nashville, on 23d day' of September…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Letellier-Phillips Paper Co. v. FiedlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  2. Rose v. CoffieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  3. Stall v. CassadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Haynes, Neel & Co. v. Carter & UptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Haynes, Neel & Co. v. Carter & UptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API