Legal Opinion

Burrow-Jones-Dyer Shoe Co. v. Gerlach Mercantile Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1918No. 1254PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Hemphill County Court; Hon. J. L. Jennings, Judge. Garnishment proceedings by the Burrow-'Tones-Dyer Shoe Company against the Ger-laeh Mercantile Company. Judgment for .garnishee, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

Appellant, Burrow-Jones-Dyer 'Shoe Company, obtained judgment on nonresident notice by publication against James Margetts, with foreclosure of certain attachment liens, and also a judgment against certain garnishees on garnishment issued before rendition of the judgment against Mar-■getts. After the rendition of such judgment .against Margetts appellant secured the issuance of garnishment against appellee Ger-lach Mercantile Company under the provisions of section 3, art. 271, Revised Statutes, which provide for issuance of garnishment after judgment. After this garnishment proceeding had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Stewart v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Berry Bros. v. Nelson Davis & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Weston v. BeverlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Automobile Finance Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Haley v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Durham v. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. First Nat. Bank of Houston v. C. H. Meyers & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Grice v. American Ry. Express Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API