Durham v. Scrivener
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
This is a proceeding by Cordell Petroleum Company, one of the appellants in the above cause, and by the City National Bank of Commerce of Wichita Falls, Tex., for mandamus and injunction to set aside and restrain the enforcement of a certain garnishment judgment.
Appellees, Scrivener and Wortham, as intervener, brought suit in the district court of Travis county to cancel a certain deed of conveyance, and to recover a moneyed judgment for oil alleged to have been taken from the lands conveyed.
On May 29, 1920, they recovered judgment for cancellation of the deed and a moneyed judgment, joint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas Trunk Railway Co. v. Jackson Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
- Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
- Orchard v. Wright-Dalton-Bell-Anchor Store Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Simmang v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
- National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd. v. Oconto Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McDonald v. AyresTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Birdville Independent School District v. Hurst AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
- Cleveland v. Alpine Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Fulmore v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Ex parte BonifaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.