Legal Opinion

Krauter v. Simonin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 1, 1921No. 199PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Isaac M. Simonin, trading as C. F. Simonin’s Sons, against Sigmund Krauter. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

On' July 16, 1919, the defendant in error agreed to sell and deliver to the plaintiff in error 1,000 barrels of Ceylon grade cocoanut oil, not to contain over 7 per cent, free fatty acid, at a price of 20 cents per pound net cash, without discount. The plaintiff in error agreed to furnish a 90-day confirmed bank credit for documents, payment to b,e made against an f; a. s. railroad bill of lading, Philadelphia weighmaster’s weight certificate and certificate of analysis. By a supplemental agreement on December 1, 1919, there was a substitution of “refined edible cocoanut…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lagerloef Trading Co. v. American Paper Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
  2. Birdsong v. W. H. & F. Jordan, Jr., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. T. W. Warner Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. T. W. Warner Co. v. AndrewsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API