Legal Opinion

T. W. Warner Co. v. Andrews

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this action is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware; and by virtue of the general appearance of the defendant in this action, the question of the residence of the defendant becomes immaterial.

On June 7, 1927, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract in the state of California by the terms of which plaintiff agreed to sell 2,500 shares of the preferred capital stock and 1,250 shares of the common stock of the Peerless Scale Corporation, a Virginia corporation, together with scrip dividend No. 8…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Brady v. DalySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Carthage Tissue Paper Mills v. Village of CarthageNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Hunter v. . WetsellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Agar v. OrdaNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. T. W. Warner Co. v. AndrewsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  2. The Pep Boys v. Old Republic Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API