People v. Consolidated Edison Co.
New Rochelle City Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrank H. Connelly, J.
Defendant, appearing “ specially ”, moves to vacate the service of the summons upon it because of supposed irregularities in its contents and mode of service.
Except for the possible sanction of a $25 fine (Code Grim. Pro., § 150), a Criminal summons may be disregarded by an individual defendant for, unlike a civil summons, its service does not confer jurisdiction over his person (People v. Levins, 152 Misc. 650; People v. Marchetti, 154 Misc. 147; People v. Le Bous, 29 Misc 2d 850). That is accomplished by obtaining the defendant’s physical presence before the Bench, whether he be brought…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People ex rel. Mertig v. JohnstonNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. LevinsNew York Court of Special Session · 1934
- People v. MarchettiNew York Court of Special Session · 1934
- People v. Perfecto Chemical Co.New York Court of Special Session · 1924
- People v. Le BousBinghamton City Court · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ByfieldCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1986
- People v. MacFarlene Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Coville v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. Alrich Restaurant Corp.Nassau County District Court · 1967
- People v. MulliganSuffolk County District Court · 1970