People v. Alrich Restaurant Corp.
Nassau County District Court
1Opinion of the CourtI. Stanley Rosenthal, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss the information as against the corporate defendant and the individual defendant, alleging that the information is unlawful and invalid for the failure to serve a corporate defendant pursuant to section 675 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The motion raises the question of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction, powers and essential procedure are conferred by statute. (People v. Weiner, 3 Misc 2d 794.) A corporation can only be brought before the court by a summons properly served. Where the record is wholly devoid of any proof that the service of summons was made according to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- People v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. SakowNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Kuriansky v. AzamNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. Artrol Corp.Justice Court of Village of Ocean Beach · 1971