Legal Opinion
People v. MacFarlene Co.
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided October 23, 1985PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Leona Freedman, J.
On June 4, 1985 a criminal summons was issued to MacFarlene Company for the defendant’s failure to "renew hoist-way doors” and to "provide interlocks” (alleged violations of Administrative Code of City of New York §§ C26-105.1, C26105.2, RS 18-1). On June 6, 1985 two criminal summonses were issued to Robert McFarlan(e) for "no permits” (alleged violations of Administrative Code § C26-114.1). All summonses were "served” by personal delivery to Sean Heverin, whose relationship to the subject premises is not entirely clear.
All three cases have appeared on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. NeubeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- People v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Lurie v. District AttorneyNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. RockwellCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
- People v. LevinsNew York Court of Special Session · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. ByfieldCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1986
- People v. GrossCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
- People v. Consolidated Edison Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
- People v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
- People v. CooreYonkers City Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.