Legal Opinion
Mars v. Herman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1944No. 174PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Appellee, plaintiff below, claimed dain-ages for breach of warranty. A verdict was rendered in her favor, judgment was entered, and the defendant has appealed. The parties will be designated as in the trial court.
Defendant was in the business of selling furnishings and equipment, chiefly to hotels, apartment buildings, and institutions. He dealt directly with manufacturers and was able to sell at lower than store prices. While negotiating a sale of rugs and furnishing-s for the apartment building where plaintiff resided, defendant’s salesman was interviewed by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Naumann v. Wehle Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Giant Mfg. Co. v. Yates-American Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Dow Drug Co. v. NiemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Keenan v. Cherry WebbSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brennan v. Shepherd Park Pharmacy, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Hagedorn v. TaggartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Woodward & Lothrop v. HeedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. American Locomotive Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. American Locomotive Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962