Woodward & Lothrop v. Heed
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment after verdict of a jury in favor of the appellee in a suit for breach of implied warranty in the sale of a muskrat fur coat.
At the trial appellee testified that she had purchased the coat at appellant’s store; that its salesman assured her the fur would wear well and, having no experience in furs, she relied on his skill and judgment. She paid the purchase price of $297.78, and the coat was delivered to her in the latter part of November, 1943. She used it carefully, seldom wearing it on street cars or busses, kept it on a hanger at her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Landers v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Cavanagh v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Brandenberg v. the Samuel StoresSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Henderson v. AllisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Snyder v. ThornileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948