Legal Opinion

Woodward & Lothrop v. Heed

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1945No. 315PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment after verdict of a jury in favor of the appellee in a suit for breach of implied warranty in the sale of a muskrat fur coat.

At the trial appellee testified that she had purchased the coat at appellant’s store; that its salesman assured her the fur would wear well and, having no experience in furs, she relied on his skill and judgment. She paid the purchase price of $297.78, and the coat was delivered to her in the latter part of November, 1943. She used it carefully, seldom wearing it on street cars or busses, kept it on a hanger at her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Landers v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Cavanagh v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Brandenberg v. the Samuel StoresSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Henderson v. AllisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Snyder v. ThornileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API