Legal Opinion
Westman Commission Co. v. Hobart Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 26, 1983No. Civ. A. 76-K-918PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THIRD MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
I have previously determined liability in this antitrust case. My memorandum opinion and order is reported at 461 F.Supp. 627 (D.Colo.1978). Following a trial on damages I issued findings of fact, conclusions of law and order which can be found at 541 F.Supp. 307 (D.Colo.1982). The case is now before me for determination of an award for attorney fees and costs. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the cited opinions.
Westman was the successful plaintiff and is entitled to a reasonable attorney fee. Westman lost profits of $1,032,895.00.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hughes v. RepkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Arthur H. Pitchford and Pitchford Scientific Instruments Corporation v. Pepi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Frank Nisley, Jr., Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. John F. Wade, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Howard Balsley, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. UnnamedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- T.A. Pelsue Co. v. Grand Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Oiness v. Walgreen Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- United States Court of Appeals, Third CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984