Legal Opinion
Oiness v. Walgreen Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 9, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-F-727PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the court on several post-trial Motions: Defendants’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict and Plaintiffs’ Motion for a New Trial on the Issue of Damages, and for Prejudgment Interest, Costs, Increased Damages, and Attorneys’ Fees. By this Order we deny defendants’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict and plaintiffs’ Motion for a New Trial on the issue of damages and for prejudgment interest and fees, and grant plaintiffs’ request for increased damages based upon a finding of willful infringement.
This suit…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oiness v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Oiness v. Walgreen Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Oiness v. Walgreen CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996