Legal Opinion

United States v. Roger Alan Lee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1993No. 92-10473PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Roger Alan Lee appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines of 20 months’ imprisonment upon his conviction by guilty plea of counterfeiting obligations of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471. Lee argues that the district court erred in counting a sentence he received for an un-counseled misdemeanor battery conviction in determining Lee’s criminal history category because even if constitutionally valid, such convictions may not be used for sentence enhancement under Baldosar v. Illinois, 446 U.S. 222, 100 S.Ct. 1585, 64 L.Ed.2d 169 (1980). The government responds that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Leon BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Erwin Darrell NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Walter Moray WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Charles L. EckfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MaxeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States v. Ralph Perez DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James K. KANEAKUA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. FitchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. State v. MaxeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API