United States v. Roger Alan Lee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Roger Alan Lee appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines of 20 months’ imprisonment upon his conviction by guilty plea of counterfeiting obligations of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471. Lee argues that the district court erred in counting a sentence he received for an un-counseled misdemeanor battery conviction in determining Lee’s criminal history category because even if constitutionally valid, such convictions may not be used for sentence enhancement under Baldosar v. Illinois, 446 U.S. 222, 100 S.Ct. 1585, 64 L.Ed.2d 169 (1980). The government responds that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Leon BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Erwin Darrell NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Walter Moray WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Charles L. EckfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MaxeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Ralph Perez DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James K. KANEAKUA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. FitchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- State v. MaxeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.