Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James K. KANEAKUA, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 1997No. 95-10412PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSKOWITZ, District Judge:

James K. Kaneakua was convicted under the Assimilative Crimes Act (“ACA”), 18 U.S.C. § 13, of first degree burglary and unauthorized control of an automobile on the Pearl Harbor Naval Station. The district court sentenced Kaneakua to a mandatory minimum sentence of 40 months as required by the Hawaii Repeat Offender Statute, H.R.S. § 706 — 606.5(l)(a)(iii). Kaneakua appeals, contending that the court erred in imposing sentence under the Hawaii Repeat Offender Statute and should have instead sentenced him under the federal sentencing guidelines. We affirm.

On March 23,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Mark Kevin BinderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott KARTERMAN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. WahidCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. TorresHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. United States v. D. New Mexico Tommy R. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. FitchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API