Legal Opinion

Junge v. MacKnight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PetitioN to rehear this case, reported in 135 N. C., 105.

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

This cause is before us upon a petition to rehear. After a full and anxious consideration we are of the opinion that the petition should be allowed and the judgment *286of the Superior Court affirmed, thus reversing the decision of this Court. 135 N. C., 105. We are not inadvertent to the well-settled rule of this Court recognized and adhered to in a number of cases which will be found collected in Clark’s Code, Rule 53, p. 943. We are of the opinion that in respect to a question of practice, especially where, in a matter of which we are compelled to take notice, the almost uniform custom has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Morisey v. . SwinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Currie v. Golconda Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Simms v. . SampsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Dehoff v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Osborn v. . LeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API