First National Bank v. Briggs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Clay county, against Binaldo B. Briggs, Ferdinand A. Elder and George A. Elder, as copartners as Briggs & Elders, upon certain promissory notes, and, on January 14, 1885, caused the property of the defendants F. A. Elder and G. A. Elder to be attached.
Read the full summary
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Clay county, against Binaldo B. Briggs, Ferdinand A. Elder and George A. Elder, as copartners as Briggs & Elders, upon certain promissory notes, and, on January 14, 1885, caused the property of the defendants F. A. Elder and G. A. Elder to be attached. On January 22, 1885, each of those two defendants made an assignment in insolvency to F. J. Burnham, under Laws 1881, c. 148. On February 7, 1885, on application of the assignee, an order was made by Collins, J., dissolving and vacating the attachment, and on February 14th written notice…
1Opinion of the CourtDioKInson, J.
We will first express our decision upon the motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal. February 7,1885, the court made an order dissolving an attachment against the property of the defendants Elder, but also ordered that proceedings under such order should be stayed for 30 days. Before the expiration of the 30 days, the court granted an order to show cause, on the 14th day of March, why the order dissolving the attachment should not be vacated, and also further stayed all proceedings under such former order. Upon hearing upon the order to show cause, the court reconsidered its…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Harcum v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- In Re Guardianship of JausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Kolb v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- McCrank v. McCrankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953