Legal Opinion

State v. Foxley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1926No. 4391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

The state brought this action to recover on a bail bond on which it is alleged Foxley was the principal and the appellants sureties. Foxley was not served. The sureties filed a demurrer and answer. The demurrer was overruled. The case was tried to the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence the court, on motion of the state, peremptorily directed a verdict in favor of the state and against the sureties for the full amount of the undertaking, $2,000 and costs. Judgment was entered accordingly, from which the sureties have prosecuted this appeal. The alleged errors are that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pawling and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  2. Dair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. United States v. DunbarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  4. State v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Coburn v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stephens v. FosterArizona Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API