Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Foster

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1935No. Civil No. 3606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoss, J.

— Plaintiff, Bobert C. Foster, claiming to be the owner of a certain Hupmobile sedan, on March 9, 1934, brought this action against defendant, C. P. Stephens, for its possession, or its value placed at $400, and for damages for the loss of its use placed at $2,000. The case was tried before a jury and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $650, apportioned $200 as the value of the car and $450 as damages for the loss of its use, upon which verdict judgment was entered.

While the action is in form replevin, in fact it only-seeks to recover the value of the car and damages for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidated National Bank v. CunninghamArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. FoxleyUtah Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. RaffoWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Camaraza v. Bellavia Buick Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Ball Corporation v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Rasmussen v. Lee Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API