Legal Opinion

United States v. Dunbar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1897No. 360PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.

1Opinion of the Court

EOSS, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit upon two certain undertakings of bail. The court below having sustained a demurrer interposed by the defendants to the amended complaint, and the plaintiff declining to further amend, a judgment was entered dismissing the suit, with costs in favor of the defendants against the plaintiff. In so far as the judgment for costs is concerned, it was, no doubt, given through inadvertence, since in such a suit judgment for costs, against the government is not allowed.

The recognizances were taken and acknowledged before a commissioner of the circuit court of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HortonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1873
  2. United States v. RundlettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1854
  3. United States v. CaseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1871
  4. United States v. SauerDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1896
  5. Belt v. SpauldingOregon Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. MacKSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  3. United States v. ZarafonitisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907
  4. National Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  5. Kirk v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API