Legal Opinion

Britton v. Farmers Insurance Group

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1986No. 84-322PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

We determine principally in this case that an insurer must meet the standard of a lawful basis for refusal to decline payment of an insured’s claim for an insured’s loss; and that reliance by the insurer on inadmissible evidence of arson by the insured in declining payment of an insured’s loss does not meet the standard of a lawful basis for refusal of the insured’s claim.

Farmers Insurance Group (FIG) appeals a judgment granting Bill E. Britton compensatory damages of $214,748.54 and punitive damages of $400,000.00, following a jury verdict rendered in the District Court, Fourth Judicial…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Klaudt v. FlinkMontana Supreme Court · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Herrig v. HerrigWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Thayer v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API