California Prune & Apricot Growers' Ass'n v. Pomeroy Orchard Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff appealed in each of the ahoveentitled cases from an order denying its application for an injunction pendente lite and dissolving the interim restraining order theretofore issued. The essential facts are the same in each of the three cases. The action in each case was brought for the specific enforcement of a contract for the sale by defendant to plaintiff of all prunes to be produced or acquired by the defendant during the years 1923 to 1925, inclusive. The temporary injunction was sought to prevent the defendant from selling or disposing to any person other than the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Environmental Protection Information Center, Inc. v. Maxxam Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- National Assn. of Wine Bottlers v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Jordan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- General Petroleum Corp. v. BeilbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.