Legal Opinion
Acrow Corp. of America v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 17, 2010No. 10-682CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ON SUPPLEMENTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE REC*271ORD1
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
The parties to a post-award bid protest filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2006), have disputed the contents of the administrative record that properly is before the court. Their disputes concern documents, including affidavits and declarations, not the fruits of depositions or testimony taken in aid of a bid protest. Similar issues have spawned many opinions by the United States Court of Federal Claims. The rules of engagement should be simple, but they are not for two reasons.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ncl Logistics Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Communication Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Acrow Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.