Legal Opinion

In Re Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 2010No. C062466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

When the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) determines that a prisoner sentenced to an indeterminate prison term is suitable for parole (Pen. Code, § 3041), the Governor has the authority to review the matter de novo and to reverse or modify the Board’s parole decision. (Cal. Const., art. V, § 8, subd. (b); Pen. Code, § 3041.2, subd. (b); In re Lawrence (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1181, 1204 [82 Cal.Rptr.3d 169, 190 P.3d 535] [“[T]he Governor undertakes an independent, de novo review of the inmate’s suitability for parole . . . .”] (hereafter Lawrence).) When the Board or Governor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re RynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. In re CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. In re RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. In re ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API