In Re Ross
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
When the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) determines that a prisoner sentenced to an indeterminate prison term is suitable for parole (Pen. Code, § 3041), the Governor has the authority to review the matter de novo and to reverse or modify the Board’s parole decision. (Cal. Const., art. V, § 8, subd. (b); Pen. Code, § 3041.2, subd. (b); In re Lawrence (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1181, 1204 [82 Cal.Rptr.3d 169, 190 P.3d 535] [“[T]he Governor undertakes an independent, de novo review of the inmate’s suitability for parole . . . .”] (hereafter Lawrence).) When the Board or Governor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re RynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- In re CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- In re RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- In re ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014