Legal Opinion
Hall v. Proctor
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 14, 1940No. 8 Div. 26PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Appeal from decree dismissing bill in equity for want of prosecution. Such decree is reviewable on appeal. Tierce v. Knox, 207 Ala. 121, 92 So. 263; Stuckey v. Murphy, 224 Ala. 8, 138 So. 289.
It appears that pursuant to Code, § 6637, the Circuit Judge had, by order entered on the minutes, designated the first Mondays in March, June, September, and December as the times for equity sessions of the court.
However, a regular session was by special order set for April 3, 1939, and notice thereof duly given to counsel for parties in pending causes. This order was within the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. PughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Danzey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Colbert County v. Tennessee Valley BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Murphy v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Ex Parte LiddonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Terry v. GreshamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Averett v. AverettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Hall v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Ralston Purina Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Brown v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.