Legal Opinion

United Carolina Bank v. Caroprop, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1993No. 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

United Carolina Bank, as trustee under IRA for Lloyd D. Auten (Auten IRA), brought this action against Auten IRA’s cotenant, Caroprop, Ltd., and First South Savings Bank, Inc., a second mortgagee, for partition of certain property that Auten IRA and Caroprop owned as tenants-in-common. Caroprop defaulted. First South cross-claimed for foreclosure of Caroprop’s undivided interest in the property. The trial judge referred the case to the master-in-equity with finality. Both Auten IRA and First South moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of priority. The master granted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Dedes v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Carolina Attractions, Inc. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. South Carolina Federal Savings Bank v. San-A-Bel Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durham v. BlackardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. United Carolina Bank v. Caroprop, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. TateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API