Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Tate

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1993No. 2093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, Chief Judge:

This is a declaratory judgment action brought by Nationwide Insurance Company to determine whether Unisun Insurance Company had a continuing duty to defend a lawsuit involving one of Unisun’s insureds after Unisun had settled the claim and paid its limits of liability under one of its insurance policies. The trial court found that Nationwide had no standing to assert any claim against Unisun on its own behalf or on behalf of Unisun’s insured. Nationwide appeals. We affirm.

Richard Tate was injured when his automobile collided with an automobile operated by Barry Wilson. At…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sloan Construction Co. v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Unisun Insurance v. Hertz Rental Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SimmondsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. United Carolina Bank v. Caroprop, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. B.L.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Financial InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Cobb v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Devan Chokshi, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Freni Hazare, deceased Estate of Freni Hazare, and Vatsal Chokshi, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Dhruv Chokshi, deceased Estate of Dhruv Chokshi v. JMG REALTY, INC. also known as ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY also known as DEPOSITORS INSURANCE COMPANY also known as LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORP.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API