Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1999No. 67692-5PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

— Michael J. Heavey seeks a writ of mandamus prohibiting state Treasurer Michael J. Murphy from complying with RCW 82.44.110, as last amended by Referendum 49 (Laws of 1998, ch. 321, § 5). He argues that the statute violates Const, art. II, § 40 (amend. 18) in that it requires the treasurer to deposit motor vehicle excise tax (MVET) revenues into the state’s motor vehicle fund. Heavey initially requested that the attorney general initi*803ate this action. The attorney general declined his invitation, choosing instead to defend Referendum 49’s constitutionality. Heavey thereafter commenced this…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Citizens v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. STATE EX REL.(CAT) v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. WASH. STATE FARM BUREAU FEDER. v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Washington State Farm Bureau Federation v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API