Legal Opinion

Washington State Farm Bureau Federation v. Gregoire

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2007No. 78637-2PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Fairhurst, J.

The Washington State Farm Bureau Federation1 (WSFB) challenges certain taxes enacted by Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 2314.2 WSFB claims that these taxes raise revenues in excess of the fiscal year 2006 state expenditure limit and, therefore, pursuant to the Taxpayer Protection Act (TPA), are ineffective until approved by the voters. Ch. 43.135 RCW. WSFB further *290argues that Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill (ESSB) 68963 section 7(6), which amended the TPA’s process for calculating the state expenditure limit, was not effective in establishing the fiscal year 2006…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. WASH. STATE FARM BUREAU FEDER. v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Brown v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Brown v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 2009

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API