Legal Opinion

Patterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 1997No. 96-602PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we strike the public defender fee imposed, because appellant was afforded neither notice of intent to seek such a fee, nor an opportunity to contest its amount. E.g., Bryant v. State, 661 So.2d 1315…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In the Interest of L.A.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. McCarthan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API